If the Army really is so set on doing this itself, why doesn't it just build itself some cruise missile launchers and call it a day? Cruise missiles are....already a thing? Registrato: 6 Dicembre 2005 Messaggi: 32.216 Località: santu sezzidu in dommo Ratings: +9.901 . It takes a lot more than a CIWS to stop a one ton chunk of falling metal. If they could fire a medium precision grenade a few hundreds miles for 10$K a round, that may have a case, otherwise I see it quite hard to do. Strategic Long-Range Cannon MORE TO READ. Strategic Long Range Cannon. A gun based in southern Germany could hit targets as far away as western Russia, though falling short of Moscow itself. The Strategic Long Range Cannon program is now advancing through its first set of technical hurdles. It's physically possible, but it would be very difficult to engineer a practical reliable weapon. No ad hominem attacks - every story has at least two sides to it... Press J to jump to the feed. It's not like they'd be intercepting extremely low muzzle velocity mortar rounds with a gatling gun. Against hard targets the attacker could simply fire a few rounds to mission kill the CIWS systems and then follow up with a second volley. Welcome to LessCredibleDefence - the home of links which have failed to pass the quality requirement of [r/CredibleDefense] The US Army began the development of its ‘Strategic Long-Range Cannon (SLRC) in late 2019, with the weapon expected to have a range of up to 1,850 km. How do you know what the target is? Although many of these targets would ideally be serviced by the U.S. Air Force, SLRC would give the Army the capability to hit targets quickly without reaching out to another service, and without endangering pilots. That's a huge resource cost you suddenly didn't have before. Who said it’s only one cannon firing on target? 9.4k members in the LessCredibleDefence community. That cannon is being built to fire a “volume of more affordable munitions,” Rafferty said. This congressionally mandated study will assess the technology approaches, policies, and concepts of operations of the Army’s Strategic Long Range Cannon (SLRC) and how it supports the Army’s MDO vision. The Strategic Long-Range Cannon (SLRC), which could reach well over 1,000 miles, represents a key piece of the Pentagon's push for more advanced artillery … Honestly, with these numbers doesn't make a lot of sense. Check out these incredible photos of all four Air Force tactical demo team jets flying in formation. The Strategic Long-Range Cannon (SLRC) would probably be the shorter-ranged of the two, according to at least one reliable report, at about 1,000 miles. The ERCA cannon is a step ahead of a bigger program to develop a strategic, long-range cannon that could shoot 1,000 nautical miles, or 1,852 kilometers. This is dumb. Cookies help us deliver our Services. *Propaganda But in 2017, the U.S. Army revealed they were studying the development of a Strategic Long Range Cannon that could strike targets up to 1,150 miles away. Granted, the Iowa class didn't have the range the army is looking for by a long shot, but at some point shells do become large enough that bullets are ineffective against them. *WIB & blogs “If we are able to develop the strategic, long-range cannon system, the rounds may be only $400,000 or $500,000 compared to multimillion-dollar rounds. Welcome to LessCredibleDefence - the home of links which have failed to … The Strategic Long-Range Cannon(SLRC) would probably be the shorter-ranged of the two, according to at least one reliable report, at about 1,000 miles. Edit: Says it has a range on 1000 nauticle miles. *WIB & blogs Welcome to LessCredibleDefence - the home of links which have failed to pass the quality requirement of [r/CredibleDefense] Discussione in 'Warfare Moderno' iniziata da GyJeX, 5 Marzo 2020. As the US Army pivots toward peer and near-peer conflicts, a since-deleted tweet by the Army’s Combat Capabilities Development Command appears to show a conceptual image of the Strategic Long Range Cannon (SLRC) being developed under the Long Range Precision Fires (LRPF) program.The computer render glimpsed in an otherwise unremarkable image but appears to show a very large towed gun … The U.S. Army is working on a new, long-range cannon it claims can reach out and strike targets at up to 1,150 miles. *Military secrets If the ranges they are talking about are accurate and this gun is firing rocket propelled projectiles to achieve velocity required it could well be entering accelerating into some pretty thin air at high speed and coming down quite fast. Even better, MRSI the rounds. The military expects a demonstration prototype to be created by 2023. CIWS would be a waste of time; a missile system would work but I'm betting the lower cost per round makes it cost efficient for the attacker. I feel like they would be a lot easier to intercept by some kind of shorad compared to missiles. Rafferty offered a look at CFT program support at strategic, operational and tactical levels. Remember what happened to the Navy with the Zumwalt gun. 17 votes, 18 comments. Create a strong chamber, put in the round, and detonate a nuke behind it in the chamber. GyJeX. It is difficult to understand the rationale behind this other than "The Army must have a strategic weapon". Not to mention the chamber holding and radiation being the two most important things? Protect the target with derivatives of naval CIWS and no rounds will hit them. NEW leaked images show the US Army's latest supergun artillery piece that can hit targets sat a thousand miles away. At the strategic level, for example, the LRPF CFT is supporting two systems: the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command’s pursuit of the Long Range Hypersonic Weapon and development of a technology demonstration of a strategic long-range cannon. *Military secrets U.S. Army to test a “strategic, long-range cannon” by 2023 The U.S. military may soon be able to shoot projectiles over a distance spanning 1,150 miles – roughly the same amount of space between Nashville, Tennessee and New York City – using a powerful long-range cannon. SLRC would change the rules of modern warfare. Army working toward improved Long Range Precision Fires. 9.2k members in the LessCredibleDefence community. *Military fashion *Military fashion CIWS has limited effective ranges, usually on the order of a few kilometers. Cost does matter, and we are concerned about cost. Protect the target with derivatives of naval CIWS and no rounds will hit them. You'd have to fortify every potential target in range which for a strategic weapon will be lots. 1000nm claim is also pretty out there tbh. The Strategic Long-Range Cannon will combine a new gun barrel, projectile and propellant to precisely hit targets up to 1,000 nautical miles (1,150 statute miles) away. The Strategic Long Range Cannon (SLRC), according to Murray, would have a range of up to 1,000 nautical miles—or 1,150 miles. In terms of delivery of ordnance that vs the cost of a tomahawk has got to win every time. A new gen nuke with a CH could make a nice propellant charge on the larger ends of cannon calibers. That means when you engage an incoming round it will be pretty much right on top of you. While hardened targets might be fine, the sensors that CIWS relies on would be vulnerable. *Current weapon sales Which makes a 2019 study by the California think-tank RAND applicable to … The U.S. Army is wading into a major science and technology development area to build a strategic, long-range cannon — one that can shoot a projectile 1,000 nautical miles. The U.S. Army could soon have a cannon that can fire much further than any gun in the world. RELATED. 32 votes, 51 comments. A regular gun is fundamentally constrained by the detonation velocity of its propellant charge, which means for something like gun cotton no going to orbit for you. Organization. Army long-range cannon attacks a target 43 miles away charlottelarson 3 weeks ago The Army’s groundbreaking long-range artillery hit a target 43 miles away over the weekend, military officials said, saying the Pentagon would give the United States a major battlefield advantage over enemies such as China and Russia. HARP was conceived as a satellite launch vehicle and could reliably loft projectiles up to 111 miles into space, but was cancelled in 1967. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the LessCredibleDefence community, Continue browsing in r/LessCredibleDefence. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. By Devon L. Suits, Army News Service October 10, 2019. In 1789 after the Revolution there was only one … There are some, definitely, physics challenges in doing these types of things, and that is the trade-off.”. *Current weapon sales A light gas gun or a railgun can achieve much higher velocities, but those are far more complicated apparatuses. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the LessCredibleDefence community, Continue browsing in r/LessCredibleDefence. “A lot of that comes down to cost,” Army Chief of Staff Gen. James McConville told Defense News in a recent interview. The Army would use SLRC to attack targets far behind enemy lines, such as army-level headquarters, ammunition depots, fuel dumps, and other high-level targets. *Anecdotes & tidbits By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. you can get it down to $325,000 if you reload rounds at home. No ad hominem attacks - every story has at least two sides to it... Press J to jump to the feed. Missiles that could intercept the rounds farther out could solve this problem but they'd cost more than the rounds themselves. No, because you’d need to create a small nuke which is not feasible. A US military official has confirmed that the Army will embark on efforts to construct a groundbreaking strategic, long-range cannon (SLRC) capable of firing projectiles some 1,000 nautical miles (1,150 miles or 1,850 kilometers). It would use a cannon barrel to launch artillery shells with built-in rocket boosters that ignite in mid-air. *Current news links *Historical events Also the acceleration forces would be immense, making it challenging to make electronics that were reliable enough to steer the thing near the end of it's flight. “If we are able to develop the strategic, long-range cannon system, the rounds may be only $400,000 or $500,000 compared to multimillion-dollar rounds,” McConville said. Welcome to LessCredibleDefence - the home of links which have failed to … The best HARP ever accomplished was still just a quarter of the velocity needed to launch a satellite. I don't doubt that you could make a stationary V-3 type gun with a range of 1000 nautical miles but then it would be vulnerable to attack. It'd more-or-less work, but it wouldn't be cost effective at all. Col. John Rafferty, head of the Long Range Precision Fires CFT, told Defense News in advance of this week's Association of the US Army (AUSA) Annual Meeting that the Army wants to demonstrate a prototype of the gun system by 2023. The Strategic Long-Range Cannon and the hypersonic missile could boast similar ranges. A ballistic flight round has only one benefit in terms of penetrating A2/AD bubbles: it is small. The Army is planning for Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) in 2035 where it will need to deter or engage a peer or near-peer adversary. Otherwise it is flying a predictable trajectory at a relatively low speed. *Historical events Like x 1; GyJeX, 5 Marzo 2020 #1 (Per rispondere devi entrare o registrarti.) It was cancelled because any school boy with pen and paper could see a conventional cannon was never going to actually launch a satellite. About this Author . The Strategic Long-Range Cannon (SLRC) would probably be the shorter-ranged of the two, according to at least one reliable report, at about 1,000 miles. Strategic Long Range Cannon (SLRC), for a hypersonic projectile, a; target capability for the Field Artillery (its howitzers) and Air Defense Artillery (a 500 km missile), and a; test case for the acquisition process of the U.S. Army. Thus, a "successful" intercept can still shower you with deadly fragments, similar to what happened with Scud intercepts during the Gulf War. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Share on Twitter; Share on Facebook; Share on Reddit; Share on LinkedIn The Army has lifted the veil on its plans for a Strategic Long Range Cannon, outlining a $228 million, three-year funding project that aims to mature technologies for both weapons and munitions in order to one day dramatically increase the reach of its artillery forces and advance a key leadership priority to bolster the punch of the service's long-range precision fires inventory. the Strategic, Long-Range Cannon is to be able to successfully engage targets out to 1,000 nautical miles. A cannon with a 1,150 mile range is fantasy-land capability. Will it be low speed? *Propaganda The Strategic Long Range Cannon (SLRC) resembles the 20th century guns used to bombard battlefields from miles away. *Current news links It's worth the 400k per round just to see it in secondary direct fire mode when it hits an enemy soldier in the chest from 500 meters away. Iowa class ships lobbed rounds that weighed over a ton. In the fires commander’s back pocket, though, will be the strategic cannon with 1,600-km range. Put a lot of these on Kyushu Japan and you just put a huge amount of China in range. However, if the Army can make it mobile it would definitely be a worthwhile investment; you'd get the reach of cruise and ballistic missiles at a fraction of the cost. Please see Casaba howitzer. About Jen Judson. If successfully developed and fielded, these systems would either be deployed to existing units or new units would be created to accommodate these new weapon systems. My biggest skepticism is whether they can make SLRC mobile. Ignoring radiation and assuming the chamber holds, wouldn’t that basically work? Have a battery of 8 do a fire mission to saturate defenses. The Strategic Long Range Cannon is a prototype mega-cannon envisioned to fire rounds hundreds of miles at high-priority enemy radar and air-defense sites, namely those of Russia and China. It would use a cannon barrel to launch artillery shells with built-in rocket boosters that ignite in mid-air. *Anecdotes & tidbits They don't have to be small.

Amforward Phone Number, Total Revenue In Tagalog, Horizontal Line Example, Graceling Movie Cast, Bus éireann Number, British Name Generator, Sdn Nyu 2021, Lakes In Maryland With Cabins,